Smoking and COPD Knowledge in the General Spanish Population: A CONOCEPOC Study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this analysis is to evaluate tobacco use and the level of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) knowledge among the general adult population in Spain and to compare these results to those obtained in the 2011 survey. METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational, epidemiological study was conducted by telephone interviews and stratified by sex, age, and setting. The study design was identical to that of the study conducted in 2011. RESULTS: Of a total of 89,601 phone contacts, there were 6534 respondents. The average age was 61.5 years. With respect to smoking, 30.9% reported being former smokers and 14.7% were current smokers, 63.6% of whom reported having attempted to quit. Among the current smokers, 19.7% claimed to use electronic cigarettes, although 88% believe these pose a health risk. No significant differences were found in smoking prevalence or frequency of attempts to quit according to residential setting (rural/urban). The highest prevalence of current smoking in men was recorded in the 55-64 years age range (31.6%), while in women it was from 45 to 54 years (34.6%). Smoking has decreased with respect to 2011, from 21.1% to 16.1% in men and from 17.9% to 13.2% in women, with a clear variability according to region. Of the population surveyed, 32.5% had spontaneous knowledge about COPD, with significant geographic variability. The most frequent sources of information about the disease were social media and the Internet (39.6%), followed by the media (35.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of tobacco use in adults has considerably decreased and there is greater knowledge about COPD in Spain, although there is significant variability according to region, which could explain the geographic variability in the prevalence of COPD. Strategies are needed to increase COPD education and awareness and to reinforce smoking prevention measures among women.

Characteristics and Management of Patients with Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough in Outpatient Hospital Clinics in Spain: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Chronic cough (cough that persists for ≥ 8 weeks) can cause a range of physical symptoms and psychosocial effects that significantly impair patients' quality of life. Refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC) are challenging to diagnose and manage, with substantial economic implications for healthcare systems. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter non-interventional study aimed to characterize the profile and health resource consumption of patients with RCC or UCC who attended outpatient clinics at Spanish hospitals. Data were collected from medical records of patients with RCC or UCC for up to 3 years before study inclusion. RESULTS: The patient cohort (n = 196) was representative of the chronic cough population (77.6% female, mean age 58.5 years). Two-thirds of patients (n = 126) had RCC. The most frequently visited doctors were pulmonologists (93.4% of patients) and primary care physicians (78.6%), with a mean of 5 visits per patient over three years' observation. The most common diagnostic tests were chest x-ray (83.7%) and spirometry with bronchodilation (77.0%). The most commonly prescribed treatments were proton pump inhibitors (79.6%) and respiratory medications (87.8%). Antibiotics were prescribed empirically to 56 (28.6%) patients. Differences between RCC or UCC groups related mainly to approaches used to manage cough-associated conditions (gastroesophageal reflux disease, asthma) in patients with RCC. CONCLUSION: RCC and UCC are responsible for high health resource utilization in Spanish hospitals. Specific treatments targeting the pathological processes driving chronic cough may provide opportunities to reduce the associated burden for patients and healthcare systems.

The U-Shaped Relationship Between Eosinophil Count and Bronchiectasis Severity: The Effect of Inhaled Corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Although a proven relationship exists between the blood eosinophil count (BEC) and the severity of both asthma and COPD, its relationship with bronchiectasis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between BEC and the number and severity of exacerbations, and patients' responses to inhaled corticosteroid (IC) treatment in bronchiectasis RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an association exist among BEC, the number of exacerbations and severity of bronchiectasis, and IC treatment? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter (43 centers) prospective observational study derived from the Spanish Bronchiectasis Registry. Patients with proven bronchiectasis and a known BEC were included, whereas those with asthma or antieosinophilic treatments were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups according to the BEC at the time of inclusion in the study in a steady-state situation: (1) eosinopenic bronchiectasis (< 50 eosinophils/µL), (2) low number of eosinophils (51-100/µL), (3) normal number of eosinophils (101-300/µL), and (4) eosinophilic bronchiectasis (> 300 eosinophils/µL). RESULTS: Nine hundred twenty-eight patients finally were included: 123 patients (13.3%) with < 50 eosinophils/µL (eosinopenic group), 164 patients (17.7%) with 50-100 eosinophils/µL, 488 patients (52.6%) with 101-300 eosinophils/µL, and 153 patients (16.5%) with > 300 eosinophils/µL (eosinophilic group). BEC showed a significant U-shaped relationship with severity, exacerbations, lung function, microbiologic profile, and IC treatment (these being higher in the eosinopenic group compared with the eosinophilic group). IC treatment significantly decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the group of bronchiectasis patients with > 300 eosinophils/µL. INTERPRETATION: A significant U-shaped relationship was found between BEC and severity and exacerbations in bronchiectasis that was more pronounced in the eosinopenic group. IC treatment decreased the number and severity of exacerbations only in the eosinophilic group.

Severe COVID-19 Illness and α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency: COVID-AATD Study.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have reported that the geographical distribution of the prevalence of allelic variants of serine protein inhibitor-A1 (SERPINA1) and severe cases of COVID-19 were similar. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study to evaluate the frequency of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) in patients with COVID-19 and whether it was associated with having suffered severe COVID-19. RESULTS: 2022 patients who had laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mutations associated with AATD were more frequent in severe COVID versus non-severe (23% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.022). The frequency of Pi*Z was 37.8/1000 in severe COVID versus 17.5/1000 in non-severe, p = 0.001. Having an A1AT level below 116 was more frequent in severe COVID versus non-severe (29.5% vs. 23.1, p = 0.003). Factors associated with a higher likelihood of severe COVID-19 were being male, older, smoking, age-associated comorbidities, and having an A1AT level below 116 mg/dL [OR 1.398, p = 0.003], and a variant of the SERPINA1 gene that could affect A1AT protein [OR 1.294, p = 0.022]. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that patients with AATD should be considered at a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19. Further studies are needed on the role of A1AT in the prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its possible therapeutic role.

Clinical and functional characteristics of individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: EARCO international registry.

BACKGROUND: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a rare disease that is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary emphysema. The European AATD Research Collaboration (EARCO) international registry was founded with the objective of characterising the individuals with AATD and investigating their natural history. METHODS: The EARCO registry is an international, observational and prospective study of individuals with AATD, defined as AAT serum levels < 11 µM and/or proteinase inhibitor genotypes PI*ZZ, PI*SZ and compound heterozygotes or homozygotes of other rare deficient variants. We describe the characteristics of the individuals included from February 2020 to May 2022. RESULTS: A total of 1044 individuals from 15 countries were analysed. The most frequent genotype was PI*ZZ (60.2%), followed by PI*SZ (29.2%). Among PI*ZZ patients, emphysema was the most frequent lung disease (57.2%) followed by COPD (57.2%) and bronchiectasis (22%). Up to 76.4% had concordant values of FEV1(%) and KCO(%). Those with impairment in FEV1(%) alone had more frequently bronchiectasis and asthma and those with impairment in KCO(%) alone had more frequent emphysema and liver disease. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age, male sex, exacerbations, increased blood platelets and neutrophils, augmentation and lower AAT serum levels were associated with worse FEV1(%). CONCLUSIONS: EARCO has recruited > 1000 individuals with AATD from 15 countries in its first 2 years. Baseline cross sectional data provide relevant information about the clinical phenotypes of the disease, the patterns of functional impairment and factors associated with poor lung function. Trial registration www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (ID: NCT04180319).

Peripheral Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Bronchiectasis: A Marker of Disease Severity.

Most patients with bronchiectasis have a predominantly neutrophilic inflammatory profile, although other cells such as lymphocytes (as controllers of bronchial inflammation) and eosinophils also play a significant pathophysiological role. Easy-to-interpret blood biomarkers with a discriminative capacity for severity or prognosis are needed. The objective of this study was to assess whether the peripheral neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with different outcomes of severity in bronchiectasis. A total of 1369 patients with bronchiectasis from the Spanish Registry of Bronchiectasis were included. To compare groups, the sample was divided into increasing quartiles of NLR ratio. Correlations between quantitative variables were established using Pearson's P test. A simple linear regression (with the value of exacerbations as a quantitative variable) was used to determine the independent relationship between the number and severity of exacerbations and the NLR ratio. The area under the curve (AUC)-ROC was used to determine the predictive capacity of the NLR for severe bronchiectasis, according to the different multidimensional scores. Mean age: 69 (15) years (66.3% of women). The mean NLR was 2.92 (2.03). A higher NLR was associated with more severe bronchiectasis (with an especially significant discriminative power for severe forms) according to the commonly used scores (FACED, E-FACED and BSI), as well as with poorer quality of life (SGRQ), more comorbidities (Charlson index), infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and greater application of treatment. Furthermore, the NLR correlated better with severity scores than other parameters of systemic inflammation. Finally, it was an independent predictor of the incident number and severity of exacerbations. In conclusion, the NLR is an inexpensive and easy-to-measure marker of systemic inflammation for determining severity and predicting exacerbations (especially the most severe) in patients with bronchiectasis.

Knowledge of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, presence of chronic respiratory symptoms and use of spirometry among the Spanish population: CONOCEPOC 2019 study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze current data on the population's level of knowledge about COPD and to evaluate certain diagnostic interventions, such as the use of spirometry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An epidemiological, observational, cross-sectional study by telephone interview, with random dialing of landline telephone numbers, was conducted in November 2019, in a nationally representative sample of adults over 40 years of age. RESULTS: From a total of 51,079 telephone calls, a total of 1920 individuals responded. Mean age was 61.9 years and 31.6% were men. Overall, 19.4% were current smokers and 13.4% reported respiratory disease (5% reported COPD). In total, 27.9% had spontaneous knowledge of COPD, which is a relative increase from the 17% observed in 2011. The most frequent information channel was the media (35.5%), with a significant presence of social networks and the Internet (25.7%). Almost one fifth (18.1%) had chronic respiratory symptoms. Of these, 59.3% had requested medical care, and 66.2% had undergone spirometry. Spirometry was performed less frequently in subjects treated in primary care compared to respiratory medicine departments (51.9% versus 79.1%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of COPD is still scarce, and strategies are needed to increase awareness and the importance of assessing respiratory symptoms and increased use of spirometry.

Cost of Hospitalizations due to Exacerbation in Patients with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Knowing the cost of hospitalizations for exacerbation in bronchiectasis patients is essential to perform cost-effectiveness studies of treatments that aim to reduce exacerbations in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To find out the mean cost of hospitalizations due to exacerbations in bronchiectasis patients, and to identify factors associated with higher costs. METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicenter study in adult bronchiectasis patients hospitalized due to exacerbation. All expenses from the patients' arrival at hospital to their discharge were calculated: diagnostic tests, treatments, transferals, home hospitalization, admission to convalescence centers, and hospitals' structural costs for each patient (each hospital's tariff for emergencies and 70% of the price of a bed for each day in a hospital ward). RESULTS: A total of 222 patients (52.7% men, mean age 71.8 years) admitted to 29 hospitals were included. Adding together all the expenses, the mean cost of the hospitalization was EUR 5,284.7, most of which correspond to the hospital ward (86.9%), and particularly to the hospitals' structural costs. The adjusted multivariate analysis showed that chronic bronchial infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, days spent in the hospital, and completing the treatment with home hospitalization were factors independently associated with a higher overall cost of the hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The mean cost of a hospitalization due to bronchiectasis exacerbation obtained from the individual data of each episode is higher than the cost per process calculated by the health authorities. The most determining factor of a higher cost is chronic bronchial infection due to P. aeruginosa, which leads to a longer hospital stay and the use of home hospitalization.

Medical Care According to Risk Level and Adaptation to Spanish COPD Guidelines (Gesepoc): The Epoconsul Study. / Atención médica según el nivel de riesgo y su adecuación a las recomendaciones de la guía española de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) (GesEPOC): Estudio EPOCONSUL.

INTRODUCTION: EPOCONSUL is the first national audit to analyze medical care for COPD in pulmonology departments in Spain. The main objective was to perform a retrospective analysis to determine the distribution of GesEPOC 2017 COPD risk levels and to evaluate clinical activity according to the new recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional clinical audit in which consecutive COPD cases were recruited over one year. The study evaluated risk and clinical phenotype according to GesEPOC 2017, and their correlation with the clinical interventions employed. RESULTS: The most common risk category was high risk (79.8% versus 20.2%; p < 0.001), characterized by a higher level of severity on BODE and BODEx indexes, and a higher comorbidity burden. The most common phenotype was non-exacerbator. The most commonly used treatment in low-risk patients was bronchodilator monotherapy (34.8%) and triple therapy in high-risk patients (53.7%). High risk was most frequently characterized by phenotype (57.6% versus 52%; p = 0.014) and pulmonary function test results: lung volume (47.7% versus 35.8%; p < 0.001), lung diffusion (51.4% versus 42.1%; p < 0.001) and walk test (37.8% versus 15.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients treated in pulmonology departments were high-risk and non-exacerbator phenotype. Clinical interventions differed according to risk level and mainly followed GesEPOC recommendations, although there is significant room for improvement.

[Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Archivos de Bronconeumología in 2010]. / Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica en Archivos de Bronconeumología en el año 2010.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continues to cause concern among health professionals treating respiratory diseases worldwide. The reasons for the increasing tendency in prevalence, morbidity and mortality rates are under constant investigation. Areas of research include identification of new phenotypes, predisposing factors, and physiopathological and epidemiological features that are still not completely known, as well as the systemic behavior of this disease and its relationship with other, associated pathological states. New and encouraging alternative treatments are also being investigated. This unceasing search for scientific knowledge is reflected in the number of studies published in each of the sections of Archivos de Bronconeumología throughout 2010, which deal with most of the pressing issues concerning this disease and which will be summarized in the present article. More than 60% of the contents of the journal's supplements were related to COPD. A monographic issue, produced for training purposes, was published and consisted of three units: the first was entitled "The thousand and one faces of COPD", the second "COPD: from etiopathogenesis to treatment" and the third "COPD: how can patient care be improved?". The authors of these units provide an in-depth and up-to-date analysis of topics relating COPD to various pathological states and include an analysis of the disease in two population groups that have aroused recent interest, namely, women and non-smokers. The third unit of the monograph deals exclusively with the patient.

[Smoking in COPD]. / Tabaquismo en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica.

Smoking is a recurrent, chronic addictive disease that causes multiple diseases and is the main known cause of avoidable morbidity and mortality, constituting a major public health problem. In developed countries, smoking is the main single cause of premature preventable morbidity and mortality. Tobacco combustion releases more than 4,000 toxic substances and more than 50 substances with demonstrated carcinogenic effects; smoking is a risk factor for six of the eight main causes of death worldwide. The treatment of smoking is both effective and cost-effective. Any therapeutic intervention performed by health professions for smoking will have beneficial results. If such interventions are adapted to the individual characteristics of each patient, their efficacy and efficiency will be much greater. All treatments are safe, with generally mild adverse effects that rarely lead to treatment withdrawal. Patients with COPD show higher nicotine dependence and seem to have greater difficulty in quitting smoking. Nevertheless, smoking cessation should be a priority in these patients, as it constitutes the only measure able to halt progression of the disease.

[Study of prevalence and attitudes on smoking in patients on continuous home oxygen therapy. Toma study]. / Estudio de la prevalencia y actitudes sobre tabaquismo en pacientes sometidos a oxigenoterapia crónica domiciliaria. Estudio toma.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to analyse the prevalence, attitudes and characteristics of smoking in the population of patients subjected to Long Term Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy (LTDOT) in the Community of Madrid. PATIENT AND METHODS: A representative sample of 845 subjects (of which 461 (46%) were male) was obtained from a total of 11,174 who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 78.25 years (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 77.55-78.95; SD=10.36). A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted based on questionnaires as well as cooximetry. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects (5.7%; 95%CI: 4.3%-7.5%) were smokers and 438 (51.8%; 95%CI: 48.5%-55.2%) were ex-smokers. The percentage of active smokers was higher in the 60 years or less subject group (χ(2); P<0.001). The large majority (75%) of smokers were men, their proportion being significantly higher than that of current non-smokers (χ(2); P<0.003). The mean score in the Fagerström Test was 3.6. More than 65% of smokers had their first cigarette up to 30 min from getting up in the morning, and 45% of these were in a preparation phase. Seventeen percent of these subjects said that they had not received advice on quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of smoking in patients on LTDOT, with a higher probability of males and younger subjects continuing to smoke. There is a high level of physical dependency for nicotine.

[COPD in nonsmokers]. / EPOC en individuos no fumadores.

The association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and smoking is well established. However, an increasing number of studies have reported a not inconsiderable prevalence of COPD among nonsmokers. Therefore, other factors, both endogenous and exogenous, may influence the development of this disease. The present article reviews the influence of possible genetic factors, gender and other respiratory diseases (such as chronic asthma and tuberculosis), as well as environmental pollution and occupational exposure in the development of COPD.

[Pharmacological treatment of COPD. Where are we now?]. / Tratamiento farmacológico de la EPOC. ¿Dónde nos encontramos?

Current clinical guidelines recommend a step-wise approach to the pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with drugs being added according to the severity of airflow obstruction, symptoms, and the number of acute exacerbations in patients with severe disease. However, greater knowledge of the physiopathogenesis of this disease has led to COPD being considered a heterogeneous process in which therapeutic decisions should not be based exclusively on the results of spirometry. Treatment is increasingly individualized according to the patient's characteristics. The present article reviews the scientific evidence on the aims of treatment in COPD and the benefits achieved by the various pharmacological options available.